Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)

D. Gopinathan Pillai ... vs State Of Kerala & Anr. ... on 15 January, 2007

8. The respondent Bank has opposed the condonation of delay by relying on D. Gopinathan Pillai Vs. State of Kerala (2007) 2 SCC 322, Ram Lal Vs. Rewa Coalfields & Ltd. AIR 1962 SC 361, Balwant Singh Vs. Jagdish Singh (2010) 8 SCC 685, and on The Municipal Council, Ahmednagar Vs. Shah Hyder Beig (2000) 2 SCC 48 and by pleading that the appellant Federation is not recognized by the respondent Bank and has no locus standi as already held by the learned Single Judge and the application does not disclose any sufficient cause.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 238 - Full Document

Municipal Council, Ahmednagar And Anr vs Shah Hyder Beig And Ors on 8 December, 1999

8. The respondent Bank has opposed the condonation of delay by relying on D. Gopinathan Pillai Vs. State of Kerala (2007) 2 SCC 322, Ram Lal Vs. Rewa Coalfields & Ltd. AIR 1962 SC 361, Balwant Singh Vs. Jagdish Singh (2010) 8 SCC 685, and on The Municipal Council, Ahmednagar Vs. Shah Hyder Beig (2000) 2 SCC 48 and by pleading that the appellant Federation is not recognized by the respondent Bank and has no locus standi as already held by the learned Single Judge and the application does not disclose any sufficient cause.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 521 - Full Document

Indra Sawhney Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others, Etc. Etc. on 16 November, 1992

19. A nine Judge bench of the Supreme court in the Indra Sawhney Vs. Union of India (1992) 3 SCC 217, overruling the earlier settled view, held that reservation of appointment or post under Article 16(4) is confined to initial appointment only and cannot extend to provide reservation in matters of promotion. It was held that promotion is an incident of service which comes after appointment and „appointment‟ simpliciter means initial appointment to a service. To undo the effect of the said dicta, the Constitution 77th Amendment, introducing Article 16(4-A) to expressly provide for reservation in promotions was brought.
Supreme Court of India Cites 136 - Cited by 1429 - B P Reddy - Full Document

All India Ex-Serviceman Bank ... vs Union Of India, Represented By ... on 15 September, 1997

24. The senior counsel for the appellant also argued that a similar issue has also been raised before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in CWP No.6681/2014 titled All India Ex Servicemen Bank Employees Federation Vs. Union of India and which vide an interim order dated 7th April, 2014 has permitted the ex-servicemen concerned therein to take the examination subject to the outcome of the writ petition which is still pending consideration.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1