cites: 682661

Ramesh Chandra Verma vs R.D. Verma And Ors. on 29 October, 1957

In R. C. Verma's case, AIR 1958 All 532 Mehrotra J. of the Allahabad High Court observed that in a given case refusal to afford a reasonable opportunity to take legal advice when viewed in the light of the other circumstances may legitimately lead to the inference that the civil servant involved was not given a reasonable opportunity to defend himself.

Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Karuppa Udayar vs State Of Madras, Represented By The ... on 18 October, 1955

In the first instance, it is pointed out that this ground is not contained in the petition, next it is urged that tire petitioner has no such right of being represented by the counsel; assistance for this submission has been sought from Karuppa Udayar v. The State of Madras, AIR 1956 Mad 460, Lakshmi Narain Gupta v. A. N. Puri, AIR 1954 Cal 335, James Bushi v. Collector of Ganjam, AIR 1959 Orissa 152, Punjab State v. Bhagat Singh, (S) AIR 1955 Punj 118 and an unreported decision at Capoor J. in P. C. Vadhwa v. State, Civil Writ No. 887 of 1959 (Punj.).

Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Lakshmi Narain Gupta vs A.N. Puri And Anr. on 16 February, 1953

In the first instance, it is pointed out that this ground is not contained in the petition, next it is urged that tire petitioner has no such right of being represented by the counsel; assistance for this submission has been sought from Karuppa Udayar v. The State of Madras, AIR 1956 Mad 460, Lakshmi Narain Gupta v. A. N. Puri, AIR 1954 Cal 335, James Bushi v. Collector of Ganjam, AIR 1959 Orissa 152, Punjab State v. Bhagat Singh, (S) AIR 1955 Punj 118 and an unreported decision at Capoor J. in P. C. Vadhwa v. State, Civil Writ No. 887 of 1959 (Punj.).

Calcutta High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

James Bushi vs Collector Of Ganjam And Anr. on 6 February, 1959

In the first instance, it is pointed out that this ground is not contained in the petition, next it is urged that tire petitioner has no such right of being represented by the counsel; assistance for this submission has been sought from Karuppa Udayar v. The State of Madras, AIR 1956 Mad 460, Lakshmi Narain Gupta v. A. N. Puri, AIR 1954 Cal 335, James Bushi v. Collector of Ganjam, AIR 1959 Orissa 152, Punjab State v. Bhagat Singh, (S) AIR 1955 Punj 118 and an unreported decision at Capoor J. in P. C. Vadhwa v. State, Civil Writ No. 887 of 1959 (Punj.).

Orissa High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 8 - Full Document