Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 137 (0.90 seconds)Section 269UD in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 269UE in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 269C in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 52 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Barium Chemicals Ltd. And Anr vs The Company Law Board And Others on 4 May, 1966
In our opinion, the point is concluded by the above decision also. Since no satisfaction has been arrived at by the respondent on the basis of objective facts and no reasons have been recorded for coming to a positive conclusion as to why there was difference of more than 15 per cent., the order cannot be said to be in accordance with law and must be quashed and set aside."
Anagram Finance Ltd. vs Appropriate Authority And Anr. on 30 March, 1995
The Bench had followed the judgment of the Division Bench delivered on March 30, 1995 (Anagram Finance Ltd. v. Appropriate Authority . The appropriate authority passed the order of compulsory purchase on April 28, 1995, and that was challenged before the Bench. The order was passed without affording any opportunity to the petitioner against the proposed action of purchasing the property. The court observed (page 279) :
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Ii vs Vimlaben Bhagwandas Patel And Kamlaben ... on 25 January, 1979
The learned judges rested their view on the observations of the Gujarat High Court in CIT v. Vimlaben Bhagwandas Patel (Smt.) , wherein it was observed (page 515) :
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Arun Mehra on 14 March, 1985
1. CIT v. Arun Mehra .