A.Velusamy vs The District Collector on 6 April, 2010
In support of his submissions, he has also taken reliance from the order of this Court in the case of A. Velusamy vs. The District Collector, Coimbatore reported in 2010 (3) CTC 57, and would further submit that the question of passing an order of injunction would apply if he is going to put up construction within 300 mts., from the quarrying area comes within the inhabited site as found in the explanation to Rule 36 (1-A) (a), (b) and (c) of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959. Therefore, when the petitioners have miserably failed to show before this Court or before the respondents 1 to 4, that the area in question wherein the petitioners have undertaken the quarrying operation is an inhabited site, the prayer sought for in the present writ petition is not maintainable.