Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.35 seconds)Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Parveen Mehta vs Inderjit Mehta on 11 July, 2002
25. Mental cruelty has also been examined in Parveen
Mehta v. Inderjit Mehta (2002) 5 SCC 706 wherein it has been
observed that:
'Cruelty for the purpose of Section 13 (1)(ia) is to be taken as a
behavior by one spouse towards the other, which causes reasonable
apprehension in the mind of the latter that it is not safe for him or
her to continue the matrimonial relationship with the other. Mental
Cruelty is a state of mind and feeling with one of the spouses due
to the behavior or behavioral pattern by the other. Unlike the case
of physical cruelty, mental cruelty is difficult to establish by direct
evidence. It is necessarily a matter of inference to be drawn from
the facts and circumstances of the case. A feeling of anguish,
disappointment and frustration in one spouse caused by the
conduct of the other can only be appreciated on assessing the
attending facts and circumstances in which the two partners of
matrimonial life have been living. The inference has to be drawn
from the attending facts and circumstances taken cumulatively.
Babita Rani And Ors. vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr. Along With ... on 26 September, 2005
20. Pw13 is Dr. T.K. Prasad, Consultant ENT, Rao Tula
Ram Hospital has stated that in January 2001, one patient Babita
Rajesh Vs. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
C.A.No.108/13 Page No. 23 of 35
came with complaint of swelling in neck and she was examined by
him vide document Ex. Pw13/A and he correctly identified his
signatures on the documents. In his crossexamination Pw13 has
stated that no MLC of the patient was prepared. He stated the
swelling was old one but exact duration cannot be explained. He has
stated that patient had been asked to get Fine Needle Aspiration
Cytology Test but patient did not come to him back with the said test
report and no prescription was made by him at that time. He stated
that no old record of the patient was produced. He admitted that he
has not brought original record of the document Ex. Pw13/A. He
denied the suggestion that he has not examined the patient.