Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.26 seconds)
Kamata Prasad Soni vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 May, 2022 cites

Union Of India And Another vs Tulsiram Patel And Others on 11 July, 1985

(iii) It is held that the authority is not required to issue notice or afford prior opportunity of representation before passing the order under Rule 8(2) of the Pension Rules of 1976, in respect of a pensioner who has been convicted in the criminal cases. However, the power of the authority to take action under the Rules would be subject to the guidelines as stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Tulsiram Patel (supra) and reiterated by this Bench in the preceding paragraphs of this judgment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 138 - Cited by 1450 - D P Madon - Full Document

Radha Krishna Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 August, 2021

12. The Division Bench in case of Radha Krishna Sharma (supra) even has not referred this Larger Bench decision. There might be a situation that nobody placed the aforesaid judgment before the Division Bench. It is something surprising that the-then Additional Advocate General appeared on behalf of the State failed to point out the decision of Larger Bench on this issue. Had it been considered and distinguished, then I can understand that the order passed by the Division Bench would have the binding effect.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 4 - S Nagu - Full Document

Santosh Kumar Seetha vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 April, 2022

13. I do not find that the latest Division Bench decision in case of Santosh Kumar Seetha (supra) considering this aspect that even while exercising the power provided under Rule 9 of Rules, 1976, no prior opportunity of hearing is required if pension is to be withdrawn because of conviction of the employee, based upon the analogy drawn by Larger Bench and as such, I do not find any reason to take a different view then the view already taken by the Larger Bench and further taken by the Division Bench in case of Santosh Kumar Seetha (supra).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - R Malimath - Full Document
1