Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.25 seconds)Narinder Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 27 March, 2014
2.They have preferred this petition under section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure banking on the ratio of
the Judgment rendered by the Three - Judge Bench of
the Apex Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab
( 2012 (4) KLT 108) and a series of other cases
which include Narinder Singh and others v. State of
Punjab and anr. (2014) 6 SCC 466) and Yogendra
Yadav and others V State of Jharkhand (2014 (9)
SCC 653 ) with a prayer to quash the proceedings. The
sole ground is that the Apex Court in the above
Crl.M.C. No. 3116 of 2016
& 2
Crl.M.C. No. 3423 of 2016
judgments have delineated the circumstances and the
cases in which inherent powers under Section 482 can
be invoked de hors section 320 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure for recognizing out of court settlement for the
purpose of quashing criminal proceedings.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
8.I am of the view that this Court is well justified in
quashing the impugned proceedings as the instant case
falls within the matrix of guidelines issued by the Apex
Court in Gian Singh ( Supra ) and the other cases
referred to above.
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1