Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)
Vikas Sarda vs Sebi on 4 March, 2026 cites

Adjudicating Officer Securities And ... vs Bhavesh Pabari on 28 February, 2019

9. He submitted that impugned order failed to consider principles laid down in P.G Electroplast ltd. v. SEBI13 ; AO, SEBI v. Bhavesh Pabari14 and Piramal Enterprises ltd v. SEBI15. He submitted that SEBI has failed to consider that there was no impact analysis of the effects of the trades of the appellants and the allegations are general in nature. The penalty imposed on the appellants is disproportionate compared to other similar cases.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 59 - S Khanna - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central), ... vs Daulatram Rawatmull on 26 March, 1964

7. Mr. Dhoot submitted that serious charges of fraud cannot be leveled by SEBI in casual manner and suspicion of SEBI cannot replace evidentiary documents. To support this, he relied on KSL & Industries v. SEBI9 and CIT v. Daulatram Rawatmull10. Further, he submitted that there is no evidence to prove that Murari Lal Sarda made any calls to the appellants. A notice on a tippee is bad in law, because no penal provision exists to punish a tippee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 94 - Full Document
1