Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.27 seconds)Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 228 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi ... vs Jitendra Bhimaraj Bijje And Ors. Etc. ... on 7 August, 1990
In Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjaya, , the Apex Court has clarified that at the stage of Sections 227 and 228 Cr.P.C. the Court is required to evaluate the material and documents on record with a view to finding out if the facts emerging therefrom taken at their face value disclose the existence of all the ingredients constituting the alleged offence and that for this limited purpose, the Court may sift the evidence.
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad Etc. ... vs Dilip Nathumal Chordia & Anr on 8 February, 1989
In Stree Atyabhar Virodhi Parishad v. Dilip Nathumal Chordia, , it has been observed that Section 227 itself contains enough guidelines for the scope of inquiry for the purpose of discharging an accused; that the word 'ground' used in the said section is net a ground for conviction but a ground for putting the accused on trial. It is in the trial, the guilt or the innocence of the accused will be determined and not ^it the time of framing of charge. The Court, therefore, need not undertake an elaborate inquiry in sifting land weighing the materials. Nor is it necessary to delve deep into the various aspects. All that the Court has to consider is whether the evidentiary material in record, if generally accepted, would reasonably connect the accused with the rime. Under Section 227 I.P.C, a duty is cast on the Judge to apply his mind to [the material on record and if on examination of the record, he does not find sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused, he must discharge him. On the other hand, if after such considerations and hearing, the Court is satisfied that a prima facie case is made out against the accused or there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed offence, a charge should be framed in accordance with the (provisions of Section 228 of the Code.
State Of Bihar vs Ramesh Singh on 2 August, 1977
In State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh, interpreting the relevant factors and duty elf the Court for discharging or framing of charge, the Apex Court has formulated the following guidelines;: