Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 120 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sri Rameshwar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2018
In the above circumstances and the discussions made as
above and further resorting to various decisions in the matter
of Sri Rameshwar Yadav Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2018
(4) SCC 608, Benjamin Roul Vs. Sajal Das reported in 2017
(2) ILR (Cut) 964 and Banamali Pradhan Vs. State of Odisha
Page 4 of 5
reported in 2019 74 OCR 232, this Court finds the impugned
order to be not in consonance with the facts and law, and
deserves to be quashed. Accordingly, the impugned order
dated 22.04.2025 stands quashed. The Petitioners are directed
to appear once in person before the learned trial court on
11.08.2025. Upon such appearance of the Petitioners, the
learned court shall pass appropriate order, dispensing with the
subsequent appearance of the Petitioners, allowing them to be
represented through their lawyer under Section 228 of the
BNSS (205 of the Cr.P.C) with further direction that as and
when the court would require the presence of the Petitioners,
they shall appear in person.
Benjamin Roul vs Sajal Das on 2 May, 2017
In the above circumstances and the discussions made as
above and further resorting to various decisions in the matter
of Sri Rameshwar Yadav Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2018
(4) SCC 608, Benjamin Roul Vs. Sajal Das reported in 2017
(2) ILR (Cut) 964 and Banamali Pradhan Vs. State of Odisha
Page 4 of 5
reported in 2019 74 OCR 232, this Court finds the impugned
order to be not in consonance with the facts and law, and
deserves to be quashed. Accordingly, the impugned order
dated 22.04.2025 stands quashed. The Petitioners are directed
to appear once in person before the learned trial court on
11.08.2025. Upon such appearance of the Petitioners, the
learned court shall pass appropriate order, dispensing with the
subsequent appearance of the Petitioners, allowing them to be
represented through their lawyer under Section 228 of the
BNSS (205 of the Cr.P.C) with further direction that as and
when the court would require the presence of the Petitioners,
they shall appear in person.
1