Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.47 seconds)

Swati Ulhas Kerkar vs Sanjay Walavalkar on 10 February, 2021

23. Mr. Alok Kumar relies on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Swati Ulhas Kerkar v. Sanjay Walavalkar, (2021) 14 SCC 57, to contend that the Board of trustees / managing committee was lacking Signature Not Verified CS(OS) 11/2024 Page 7 of 25 Digitally Signed By:NARENDRA SINGH ASWAL Signing Date:19.10.2024 19:01:02 the confidence of the majority members, therefore, it could not have admitted new members. He, therefore, urges that the interim relief as prayed by the plaintiff may be granted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 4 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document

Sarbjit Singh And Ors. vs All India Fine Arts & Crafts Soclety And ... on 24 May, 1989

45. Further, the very fact that five (05) out of nine (09) members of the Board of Trustees vide their letter dated 27.10.2023 addressed to the defendant no. 1 had pointed out various incidents of mismanagement and illegal functioning of the Foundation in violation of its MoA and supported the holding of AGM on 17.11.2023 with an agenda to hold 1 Sarbjit Singh v. All India Fine Arts & Crafts Society, ILR (1989) II Delhi 585 Signature Not Verified CS(OS) 11/2024 Page 15 of 25 Digitally Signed By:NARENDRA SINGH ASWAL Signing Date:19.10.2024 19:01:02 election of the office bearers of the Board and the MCRF shows that the MCRF had lost the confidence of the majority. In that view of the matter, this Court is prima facie of the opinion that holding of AGM few days prior to the expiry of one year term of the previous managing committee elected in 101st AGM cannot be faulted with. Assuming arguendo that the term of previous managing committee could not be curtailed and it was entitled to continue for one full year i.e. till 13.12.2023, even the said period having elapsed, the office bearers of the Board and the MCRF elected in the 102nd AGM on 17.11.2023, are entitled to continue till the time next AGM is held in accordance with MoA.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd vs Regency Convention Centra & Hotels & Ors on 6 July, 2010

69. Reference may also be had to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors., (2012) 8 SCC 384, wherein while Signature Not Verified CS(OS) 11/2024 Page 22 of 25 Digitally Signed By:NARENDRA SINGH ASWAL Signing Date:19.10.2024 19:01:02 relying on Mumbai International Airport (supra) the Court laid down the following broad principles which would govern the disposal of the instant application under Order I Rule 10 CPC:
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 432 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Vidur Impex & Traders Pvt.Ltd.& Ors vs Tosh Apartments Pvt.Ltd.& Ors on 21 August, 2012

69. Reference may also be had to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors., (2012) 8 SCC 384, wherein while Signature Not Verified CS(OS) 11/2024 Page 22 of 25 Digitally Signed By:NARENDRA SINGH ASWAL Signing Date:19.10.2024 19:01:02 relying on Mumbai International Airport (supra) the Court laid down the following broad principles which would govern the disposal of the instant application under Order I Rule 10 CPC:
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 229 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1   2 Next