Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.63 seconds)Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Jaswant Singh Nerwal Etc vs State Of Punjab And Ors. Etc on 14 February, 1991
8. The words some "reason to be recorded in writing that it is not reasonably practicable to hold enquiry" means that there must be some material for satisfaction of the disciplinary authority that it is not reasonably practicable. The decision to dispense with the departmental enquiry cannot, therefore, be rested solely on the ipse dixit of the concerned authority. The Apex Court in the case of Jaswant Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors. has observed as under:
Rajendra Prasad Singh vs State Of U.P. And Others on 5 February, 2014
In Rajendra Prasad Singh vs. State of U.P. and others7, the Court in paragraphs 9 & 10 held as follows:
Ramesh Chandra Etc vs State Of U.P. Etc on 25 March, 1980
Recently, a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Umesh Chandra vs. State of U.P. through Secretary, Special Appeal No.350 of 2017, decided on 06.08.2019, (of which I was a member), the Court construed the provisions of Rule 8 (2) (b) of the Rules, 1991. The relevant extract of the judgments is quoted below: