Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (1.28 seconds)Section 12 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Hansi Rawat & Anr. vs Punjab National Bank & Ors. on 11 January, 2013
47. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Hansi Rawat and Anr. v.
Punjab National Bank and Ors. (LPA No.785/2012) dated 11.01.2013 has
held as under:
State(Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) vs Rajinder Prasad Sharma on 2 December, 2014
48. The aforesaid rationale finds resonance in another judgment of the
Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Rajender
Prasad (W.P.[C] 10676/2016) dated 30.11.2017 wherein it was held as under:
Union Of India vs This Review Petition Having Come Up For ... on 26 February, 2014
49. While, the Apex Court in the matter of Union of India vs Namit Sharma
(Review Petition [C] No.2309 of 2012) dated 03.09.2013 observed as under:
Ashok Kumar Pandey vs The State Of West Bengal on 18 November, 2003
57. It appears that the Appellant has been repeatedly seeking information
on similar subject matters, thus using up the time and resources of the Public
Authority disproportionately. Such repetitive litigation is counter-productive to
the RTI regime, and this aspect has been discussed by the Apex Court in detail
in the case of Ashok Kumar Pandey vs. The State of West Bengal, (AIR 2003 SC
280 Para 11), where J. Pasayat had held:
Biplab Kumar Chowdhury vs The State Of West Bengal on 4 August, 2017
In this regard, the
Page 26 of 29
Commission invites attention of the parties towards a judgement of the
Hon'ble High Court of Kolkata in a case titled Biplab Kumar Chowdhury v. The
State of West Bengal & Ors. WPA 3116 of 2022 wherein it was held as under
1