Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.25 seconds)Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Karnataka Industrial Areas ... vs Anitha Purnesh on 5 August, 2016
The another co- ordinate Bench of this
Court in the case of KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND ANOTHER Vs.
3
SMT.ANITHA PURNESH AND ANOTHER dismissed
the appeal of the KIADB on the ground that there
is inordinate delay in issuing the final notification
which has been confirmed by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of KARNATAKA
INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND
ANOTHER Vs. SMT.ANITHA POORNESH AND
4
ANOTHER .
Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966
Smt Indramma vs State Of Karnataka on 27 September, 2012
In
this context, having regard to the decisions of this
Court in the case of Karnataka Industrial Areas
Development Board and other vs. Smt. Anitha
Purnesh in W.P.No.2402/2014 dated
12.04.2016, Sri Munivenkatappa and others vs.
The state of Karnataka in W.P Nos.58842-
58344/2016 dated 19.07.2018, Smt Indramma
and others vs. State of Karnataka in W.P
Nos.10667-70/2018 dated 05.07.2019 and
Sri.K.Gangadhar and others vs. State of
Karnataka and others in W.P Nos.112501-
112506/2014 dated 18.02.2016, I am of the
considered opinion that the impugned notification
and the acquisition proceedings pursuant thereto
deserve to be quashed.
K Gangadhar S/O Sri Gavi Siddappa, vs State Of Karnataka on 18 February, 2016
In
this context, having regard to the decisions of this
Court in the case of Karnataka Industrial Areas
Development Board and other vs. Smt. Anitha
Purnesh in W.P.No.2402/2014 dated
12.04.2016, Sri Munivenkatappa and others vs.
The state of Karnataka in W.P Nos.58842-
58344/2016 dated 19.07.2018, Smt Indramma
and others vs. State of Karnataka in W.P
Nos.10667-70/2018 dated 05.07.2019 and
Sri.K.Gangadhar and others vs. State of
Karnataka and others in W.P Nos.112501-
112506/2014 dated 18.02.2016, I am of the
considered opinion that the impugned notification
and the acquisition proceedings pursuant thereto
deserve to be quashed.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Narayana Gopal Krishna Hegde& Others vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 August, 1996
In the case of GOPAL KRISHNA AND
OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND
5
OTHERS , the co-ordinate Bench of this Court
allowed the appeal of the land owner on the
ground that the preliminary notification was
issued on 12.08.2020 and till date, no final
notification was issued.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Karnataka Industrial Area Development ... vs M Venkataramaiah on 6 April, 2022
"14. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court in
the case of KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND ANOTHER Vs.
1
M.VENKATARAMAIAH AND OTHERS followed the
decision in the case of K.H.SHIVANNA referred
supra, and dismissed the appeal of KIADB which
has been confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme
1
W.A.No.558/2021 Dated 06.04.2022
-6-
NC: 2026:KHC:5240
WP No. 19143 of 2023
HC-KAR
Court in the case of KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND ANOTHER Vs.
M.VENKATARAMAIAH SINCE DECEASED BY LRS AND
2
OTHERS .