Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.25 seconds)
State Of Punjab And Others vs Balwinder Singh on 9 January, 2024 cites

The State Of Punjab vs Ajit Singh on 17 September, 2007

In State of Punjab and Others v. Gurdev Singh, Ashok Kumar (1991) 4 SCC 1, the Supreme Court, while overruling the judgments of this Court in State of Punjab v Ajit Singh (1998) 1 SLR 96 and State of Punjab v. Ram Singh (1986) 3 SLR 379 held that the plaintiff's suit for the grant of decree of declaration that the order of dismissal or termination from service passed against the employee in a wrongful manner is illegal, null and void, would be governed by Article 113 of the 1963 Act and the suit cannot be filed at any point in time on the ground that such order is void ab initio. The Apex Court clearly held that even such suits shall be filed within the DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.01.25 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2024:PHHC:005621 Regular Second Appeal No. 2128 of 1991 (O&M) 4 And Other Connected Cases prescribed period of limitation as under Article 113 of the 1963 Act which is a residuary Article. In para 6 of the judgment, the Supreme Court held as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 14 - N Yadav - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Surjit Singh Conductor on 22 March, 1996

signifies that the right to file a suit accrues on the date the order is communicated to the employee. Thereafter, once again, this matter came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in State of Punjab and Others v. Rajinder Singh, Conductor (1999) SCC (L&S) 664. In this case, the Court interpreted that the suit is required to be filed within a period of three years from the date the cause of action accrues. This case in particular was related to a punishment order stopping two increments with cumulative effect.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 21 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Anr vs Balkaran Singh on 18 October, 2006

15. Keeping in view the aforesaid discussion and the observations made by the Supreme Court in Balkaran Singh's case (supra), it is held that the suit for declaring the punishment order passed by the Punishing/Disciplinary Authority as illegal, null or void is required to be filed within a period of three years as provided under Article 58 or 113 of the Schedule attached to the 1963 Act from the date when the copy of order is communicated.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 63 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next