Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.27 seconds)Section 20 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Mujibur Rehman vs Central Information Commission on 28 April, 2009
9. This Court in Mujibur Rehman Vs. Central Information Commission
MANU/DE/0542/2009 held that information seekers are to be furnished what they ask for
and are not to be driven away through filibustering tactics and it is to ensure a culture of
information disclosure that penalty provisions have been provided in the RTI Act. The Act
Page 4 of 7
has conferred the duty to ensure compliance on the PIO.
M/S S.J. And S.P. Family Trust vs Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest ... on 18 May, 2018
Moreover, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the decision J P Aggarwal v. Union of India (WP (C)
no. 7232/2009 while stating that the CPIO should not mechanically forward the information
collected through subordinates, held as under that:
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
In this context a reference was made to the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in 2011 (8) SCC
497 (CBSE Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay), wherein it was held as under:
Mardia Chemicals Ltd. Etc. Etc vs U.O.I. & Ors. Etc. Etc on 8 April, 2004
In Mardia Chemical Limited v. Union of India (2004) 4 SCC 311, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
of India while considering the validity of SARFAESI Act and recovery of non-performing assets
by banks and financial institutions in India, recognised the significance of Public Interest and had
held as under :
L.I.C. Of India & Anr vs Consumer Education & Research Centre & ... on 10 May, 1995
Similarly, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of LIC of India vs. Consumer
Education and Research Centre, AIR 1995 SC 1811 dated 10.05.1995 had held as under:
The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Ashok Kumar Pandey vs The State Of West Bengal on 18 November, 2003
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ashok Kumar Pandey vs The State Of West Bengal
(decided on 18 November, 2003Writ Petition (crl.) 199 of 2003) had made reference to the
following texts for defining the meaning of "public interest', which is stated as under: