Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.34 seconds)
Rajeev Kumar Jain And Anr vs Gulshan Kumar Jain And Ors on 29 January, 2026 cites

Pramod Kumar Jain vs State Of Chhattisgarh 12 Wpc/227/2018 ... on 29 January, 2018

62. Their is no dispute with the proposition of law laid down in case titled as case titled as 'Shyam Narayan Prasad Vs. Krishna Prasad', decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on 02/07/2018 to contend that that coparcener from moment of his birth gets share in father's CS DJ No. 57718/16 Rajeev Kumar Jain & Anr. Vs. Gulshan Kumar Jain & Ors. Page No. 29 of 46 property. However same is inapplicable to facts of present case as death of Late Sh. Salig Ram Jain is of 21/09/1964 i.e. after commencement of Hindu Succession Act and thus, the cited judgment is distinguishable as Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act 1956 will apply. Existence of Hindu Undivided Family properties is not proved
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 33 - S Agrawal - Full Document

Shyam Narayan Prasad vs Krishna Prasad on 2 July, 2018

62. Their is no dispute with the proposition of law laid down in case titled as case titled as 'Shyam Narayan Prasad Vs. Krishna Prasad', decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on 02/07/2018 to contend that that coparcener from moment of his birth gets share in father's CS DJ No. 57718/16 Rajeev Kumar Jain & Anr. Vs. Gulshan Kumar Jain & Ors. Page No. 29 of 46 property. However same is inapplicable to facts of present case as death of Late Sh. Salig Ram Jain is of 21/09/1964 i.e. after commencement of Hindu Succession Act and thus, the cited judgment is distinguishable as Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act 1956 will apply. Existence of Hindu Undivided Family properties is not proved
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 117 - S A Nazeer - Full Document

Rohit Chauhan vs Surinder Singh Alias Surender And ... on 4 May, 2011

61. Their is no dispute with the proposition of law laid down in case titled as 'Rohit Chauhan Vs. Surender Singh & Ors.', decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on 15/07/2013 by counsel for plaintiffs to contend that coparcener from moment of his birth gets share in father's property. However for applicability of this case, the Hindu Undivided Family properties must exist. In the facts of present case, the Hindu Undivided Family properties has not been shown to have existed. Further death of Late Sh. Salig Ram Jain is of 21/09/1964 i.e. after commencement of Hindu Succession Act and thus, the cited judgment is distinguishable as Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act 1956 will apply.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - L N Mittal - Full Document
1   2 Next