cites: 6946119

1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)

Phenil Sugars Private Ltd. vs . on 20 February, 2013 cites

Section 391 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 3876

Section 394 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 3658

Section 166 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 318

Section 209A in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 253

Section 216 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 41

Section 220 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 412

Section 237 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 496

Section 621A in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 108

Miheer H. Mafatlal vs Mafatlal Industries Ltd on 11 September, 1996

In Miheer H. Mafatlal v. Mafatlal Industries Ltd. (1997) 1 SCC 579, the Supreme Court explained the basic requirements that have to be satisfied before a scheme presented under Sections 391 and 394 of the Act can be approved by the Company Court as under:

Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 259 - S B Majmudar - Full Document

The Companies Act, 1956

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 77930

1 2 Next