Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)
Anil Kumar Wadhwa vs M/S M2M Buildtech Pvt Ltd & Ors on 9 March, 2026 cites

Vidya Drolia vs Durga Trading Corporation on 14 December, 2020

117. In view of the observations made by this Court in Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration Act, 1996 & the Stamp Act, 1899, In re, (2024) 6 SCC 1, it is clear that the scope of enquiry at the stage of appointment of arbitrator is limited Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed ARB.P. 149/2025 & conncected matter Page 4 of 10 By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:11.03.2026 16:51:38 to the scrutiny of prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement, and nothing else. For this reason, we find it difficult to hold that the observations made inVidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn., (2021) 2 SCC 1 and adopted inNTPC Ltd. v. SPML Infra Ltd., (2023) 9 SCC 385 that the jurisdiction of the Referral Court when dealing with the issue of "accord and satisfaction" under Section 11 extends to weeding out ex facie non-arbitrable and frivolous disputes would continue to apply despite the subsequent decision inInterplay Between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration Act, 1996 & the Stamp Act, 1899, In re, (2024) 6 SCC 1. ****
Supreme Court of India Cites 132 - Cited by 615 - S Khanna - Full Document

Ntpc Ltd. vs M/S Spml Infra Ltd. on 10 April, 2023

117. In view of the observations made by this Court in Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration Act, 1996 & the Stamp Act, 1899, In re, (2024) 6 SCC 1, it is clear that the scope of enquiry at the stage of appointment of arbitrator is limited Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed ARB.P. 149/2025 & conncected matter Page 4 of 10 By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:11.03.2026 16:51:38 to the scrutiny of prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement, and nothing else. For this reason, we find it difficult to hold that the observations made inVidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn., (2021) 2 SCC 1 and adopted inNTPC Ltd. v. SPML Infra Ltd., (2023) 9 SCC 385 that the jurisdiction of the Referral Court when dealing with the issue of "accord and satisfaction" under Section 11 extends to weeding out ex facie non-arbitrable and frivolous disputes would continue to apply despite the subsequent decision inInterplay Between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration Act, 1996 & the Stamp Act, 1899, In re, (2024) 6 SCC 1. ****
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 13 - P S Narasimha - Full Document
1   2 Next