Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.25 seconds)
Natha Apparao Kakde vs Vitthal Bhagaji Tandale And Another on 20 January, 2026 cites

Y.S.Jagan Mohan Reddy vs C.B.I on 9 May, 2013

"22. Lastly, it may be noted that as held in catena of decisions, the economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the matter of bail. The economic offences having deep- rooted conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds need to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby posing serious threat to the financial health of the country. Undoubtedly, economic offences have serious repercussions on the development of the country as a whole. To cite a few judgments in this regard are Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy vs. Central Bureau of Investigation8, Nimmagadda Prasad vs. Central Bureau of Investigation9, Gautam Kundu vs. Directorate of Enforcement (supra), State of Bihar and Another vs. Amit Kumar alias Bachcha Rai10.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 396 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs Ashis Chatterjee & Anr on 29 October, 2010

"26. While considering as to whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the manner in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused, the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence, if the accused are released on bail, the likelihood of the accused being unavailable in the event bail is granted, the possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading the courts of justice and the overall desirability of releasing the accused on bail. (Refer: Chaman Lal v. State of U.P.3; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (supra)4; Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh5; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee6; Neeru Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh7; Anil Kumar Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)8; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar @ Polia (supra)9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 3062 - D K Jain - Full Document

Jai Charan Lal vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 5 May, 1967

"26. While considering as to whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the manner in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused, the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence, if the accused are released on bail, the likelihood of the accused being unavailable in the event bail is granted, the possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading the courts of justice and the overall desirability of releasing the accused on bail. (Refer: Chaman Lal v. State of U.P.3; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (supra)4; Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh5; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee6; Neeru Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh7; Anil Kumar Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)8; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar @ Polia (supra)9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 153 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document

Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005

"26. While considering as to whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the manner in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused, the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence, if the accused are released on bail, the likelihood of the accused being unavailable in the event bail is granted, the possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading the courts of justice and the overall desirability of releasing the accused on bail. (Refer: Chaman Lal v. State of U.P.3; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (supra)4; Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh5; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee6; Neeru Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh7; Anil Kumar Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)8; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar @ Polia (supra)9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 2834 - Full Document

Masroor vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 27 April, 2009

"26. While considering as to whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the manner in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused, the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence, if the accused are released on bail, the likelihood of the accused being unavailable in the event bail is granted, the possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading the courts of justice and the overall desirability of releasing the accused on bail. (Refer: Chaman Lal v. State of U.P.3; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (supra)4; Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh5; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee6; Neeru Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh7; Anil Kumar Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)8; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar @ Polia (supra)9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 76 - D K Jain - Full Document

Neeru Yadav vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 29 September, 2015

"26. While considering as to whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the manner in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused, the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence, if the accused are released on bail, the likelihood of the accused being unavailable in the event bail is granted, the possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading the courts of justice and the overall desirability of releasing the accused on bail. (Refer: Chaman Lal v. State of U.P.3; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (supra)4; Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh5; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee6; Neeru Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh7; Anil Kumar Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)8; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar @ Polia (supra)9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 322 - D Misra - Full Document

Anil Kumar Yadav vs State Of Nct Delhi on 14 November, 2017

"26. While considering as to whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the manner in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused, the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence, if the accused are released on bail, the likelihood of the accused being unavailable in the event bail is granted, the possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading the courts of justice and the overall desirability of releasing the accused on bail. (Refer: Chaman Lal v. State of U.P.3; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (supra)4; Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh5; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee6; Neeru Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh7; Anil Kumar Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)8; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar @ Polia (supra)9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 263 - R Banumathi - Full Document

Mahipal vs Rajesh Kumar @ Polia on 5 December, 2019

"26. While considering as to whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the manner in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused, the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence, if the accused are released on bail, the likelihood of the accused being unavailable in the event bail is granted, the possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading the courts of justice and the overall desirability of releasing the accused on bail. (Refer: Chaman Lal v. State of U.P.3; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (supra)4; Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh5; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee6; Neeru Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh7; Anil Kumar Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)8; Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar @ Polia (supra)9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 848 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 3 Next