Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)
Ram Kumar Awasthi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Distt. ... on 27 June, 2025 cites

Ram Prakash Awasthi Alias Monu vs State Of U.P. And Others on 11 January, 2010

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, it is expedient to direct the opposite party no.2 i.e. Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District Ayodhya to decide the transfer application bearing Case No.65 (Ram Kumar Awasthi vs. State of U.P. and others) as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Kali Prasad Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 28 March, 2019

(II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.3 to not decide the Case No.639, under section 9-A(2) of U.P.C.H. Act (Kali Prasad and others vs. State of U.P.) relating to Village-Kotiya, Pargana- Khandasa, Tehsil- Milkipur, District Ayodhya finally during pendency of the transfer application pending before the opposite party no.2.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 5 - A Mishra - Full Document
1