Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)Girdhari Lal & Sons vs Balbir Nath Mathur & Ors on 26 February, 1986
The Court accordingly observed that the intention behind the 1951 Rules could be examined in the light of the amendment Rule 1975 and relying on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Girdhari Lal's case (supra), in which it has been observed that where the circumstances so warranted, the Court could not be a meek and mute spectator and must step forward to avoid patent injustice, the learned Single Judge finally observed as this:
Section 41 in The Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Gurdev Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab on 28 July, 1998
1. This judgment will dispose of Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 751 of 1992 Sushma Palta and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors., 750 of 1992 Kamla Makhani and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr., 1208 of 1992 Harinder Singh Chawla v. State of Punjab and Anr., 1236 of 1991 Baldev Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr. 1237 of 1991 Gurdev Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. and 1546 of 1991 Smt. Poonam etc. v. State of Punjab etc. The facts are being taken from L.P.A. No. 751 of 1992.
Section 16 in The Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 [Entire Act]
Baldev Singh And Ors. vs The Punjab State Electricity Board And ... on 27 May, 1994
1. This judgment will dispose of Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 751 of 1992 Sushma Palta and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors., 750 of 1992 Kamla Makhani and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr., 1208 of 1992 Harinder Singh Chawla v. State of Punjab and Anr., 1236 of 1991 Baldev Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr. 1237 of 1991 Gurdev Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. and 1546 of 1991 Smt. Poonam etc. v. State of Punjab etc. The facts are being taken from L.P.A. No. 751 of 1992.
Section 51 in The Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 [Entire Act]
1