Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.25 seconds)Section 34 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 366 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Vijay S. Sathaye vs Indian Airlines Ltd. & Ors on 6 September, 2013
In Vijay vs. Indian Airlines & Ors. (supra), the Apex Court
has held that when absence is for a very long period, it may amount to
voluntarily abandonment of service and in that eventuality, the bonds of
service come to an end automatically without requiring any order to be
passed by the employer.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 38 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Kamta Prasad Singh And Anr. vs The Regional Manager, Food Corporation ... on 13 May, 1974
15. Furthermore, in the context of Food Corporation of India (FCI), it has
been held in Kamta Prasad Singh vs. Regional Manager, Food
Corporation of India & Ors., AIR 1976 Pat 376 that it is not government
for the purpose of section 80 CPC. It was observed, "The fact that the capital
of the Corporation may be provided by the Central Government or that the
working of the Corporation can be supervised or directions may be issued by
the Government does not, in my view, constitute it a "government" within the
meaning of section 80 of the Code." Further, visavis the officers of FCI,
Hon'ble Patna High Court went on to observe, "Here the officers of the
Corporation are not in the service or pay of the Government. They are in the
service of the Corporation and are paid out of the funds of the Corporation.
In this view of the matter, I do not think that the officers of the Corporation
are public officers within the meaning of section 80 of the Code of Civil
Procedure."