Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.50 seconds)
Alok Prasad Verma vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 5 June, 2000 cites

Manager Govt. Branch Press &. Anr vs D. B. Belliawpa on 30 November, 1978

In fact, as stated above, the Supreme Court has also observed in Manager, Government Branch Press v. D. B. Belliappa (AIR 1979 SC 429) (supra), that ". . . . .the authority cannot withhold such information from the Court on the lame excuse that the impugned order is purely administrative and not judicial, having been passed in exercise of its administrative discretion under the rules governing the conditions of the service. , . ."
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 299 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document

Sterling Computers Limited Etc vs M & N Publications Limited And Ors on 12 January, 1993

Therefore, the reliance placed by the learned counsel for the respondents on the judgment of the Supreme Court, reported in AIR 1996 SC 51 (Sterling Computers Ltd. v. M and N Publications Ltd.), is misplaced for the reason that one proposition of law enunciated therein completely defeats the respondents' case. It has been laid down in paragraph 19 of the judgment that "...... By way of judicial review, the Court cannot examine the details of the terms of the contract which have been entered into by the public bodies or the State. Courts have inherent limitations on the scope of any such enquiry.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 386 - N P Singh - Full Document

Khudi Prosad Bhakat vs The State Of West Bengal And Anr. on 9 August, 1950

"..... the authority cannot withhold such information from the Court on the lame excuse, that the impugned order is purely administrative and not judicial, having been passed in exercise of its administrative discretion under the rules governing the conditions of the service. "The giving of reasons", as Lord Benning put it in Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering Union, (1971) 1 All ER 1148 "is one of the fundamentals of good administration" and, to recall the words of this Court in Khudi Ram v. State of West Bengal, (1975) 2 SCR 832 at p. 854 : AIR 1975 SC 550 at p. 558, in a Government of laws "there is nothing like unfettered discretion immune from Judicial review ability." The executive, no less than the judiciary, is under a general duly to act fairly. Indeed, fairness founded on reason is the essence of the guarantee epitomised in Articles 14 and 16(1)."
Calcutta High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 37 - Full Document

Common Cause, A Registered Society vs Union Of India & Ors on 3 August, 1999

16. In the aforesaid premise, I agree with the contention advanced on behalf of the petitioner that the scope of interference with the action of the Government and the governmental agencies even with respect to contractual matters have been increasingly recognized and expanded by the Supreme Court. He relies on the judgment of the Supreme Court, reported in (1999) 6 SCC 667 (Common Cause, a Registered Society v. Union of India). Emphasis has been laid on paragraphs 41 to 45 (of SCC) : (Paras 40 to 44) of the said judgment which are set out hereinbelow :--
Supreme Court of India Cites 105 - Cited by 756 - S S Ahmad - Full Document
1   2 3 Next