Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.14 seconds)
Shri Narain Gurwala vs Vadi Lal Ichcha Chand on 14 November, 1962 cites

B. Sital Prasad vs Clements Robson And Co. And Anr. on 8 January, 1921

2. It is no doubt true that there is a conflict of judicial decision on the matter. The Patna High Court in Kalu Ram v. Sheonand Rat Jokhi Ram, AIR 1932 Pat 323 dissented from the decision of the Allahabad High Court in Sital Prasad v. Clements Robson and Co., AIR 1921 All 199 (2) and held that an application under Order XXI, Rule 50 (2) is only entertainable by the Court which passed the decree and not by the transferee Court. But this view has not been accepted by the Punjab High Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Jai Narain Ram Lundia vs Kedar Nath Khetan And Others on 31 January, 1956

The petitioner contends that these cases did not in fact go against him because they were cases under an award and he contends that when an award is made a rule of the Court, the Court does not pass a decree and that these decisions were distinguished by the Patna High Court on this ground. However, I am unable to agree with this contention for the simple reason that the matter now seems to have been finally settled by the Supreme Court in Jai Narain Ram Lundia v. Kedar Nath Khetan, 1956 SCR 62. At p. 70 ( (S) AIR 1956 SC 359 at p. 363) of the report, their Lordships of the Supreme Court observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 65 - V Bose - Full Document
1