Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.26 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 9A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25M in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25N in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25O in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971
Managing Director Ecil Hyderabad Etc. ... vs B. Karunakar Etc. Etc on 1 October, 1993
7. Inviting attention to the communication addressed by the
respondent to the Assistant Labour Commissioner dated 19 July
2023, learned counsel submitted that paragraph 3 thereof
indicates that even the respondent was unaware of the admission
of conciliation proceedings, as the said fact was not disclosed in
the communication. He further invited attention to the judgment
and order dated 31 October 2023, whereby the strike commencing
from 13 July 2023 was declared illegal, and submitted that a
perusal of paragraph 47 of the said judgment demonstrates that
the findings regarding illegality of the strike were recorded against
the Union as a collective body. According to him, there is no
finding to the effect that individual members had instigated or
incited the strike. It was thus contended that there is no material
on record to establish that the present petitioner had instigated or
participated in any act of incitement of the strike.
1