Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (1.06 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Salem vs P.V.Kalyanasundaram on 14 September, 2007

10.7 The same view was also taken in the case of CIT v. P.V. Kalyanasundaram [2007] 164 Taxman 78/294 ITR 49 (SC) [decision of the Madras High Court in CIT v. P.V. Kalyanasundaram [2006] 155 Taxman 454/282 ITR 259 affirmed]: Assessee purchased certain land at a consideration as shown in sale deed executed. During a search operation, certain notes on loose sheets allegedly written by assessee were found and seized. When confronted, assessee contended that he could not remember as to why said nothings had been made but vendor admitted in his statements that he received substantial cash amount over and above sale deed amount. Though said statements were subsequently retracted by vendor, the A.O. adopted said enhanced figure admitted by vendor as actual sale consideration for purpose of assessment and made addition of difference as assessee's undisclosed income. The CIT (Appeals) deleted addition on ground that vendor's contradictory statements could not be relied upon. The Tribunal affirmed the decision of the CIT (Appeals) and the High Court dismissed revenue's appeal in limine on premise that no substantial questions of law were raised by revenue.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 108 - H S Bedi - Full Document
1   2 Next