Managing Director Ecil Hyderabad Etc. ... vs B. Karunakar Etc. Etc on 1 October, 1993
The only controversy raised in the High Court was that
as he was not supplied with the copy of the enquiry report,
the order of dismissal was bad in law. The learned Single
Judge as well as the Division Bench of the High Court have
considered the effect of the judgment of the Constitution
Bench of this Court in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad
and Ors. v. B. Karunakar and Ors.[(19930 4 SCC 727]. The
learned single Judge as well as the Division Bench of the
High Court had asked the petitioner as to what prejudice the
petitioner had suffered for non-supply thereof. Since there
was no adequate explanation offered by the petitioner, the
High Court came t the conclusion, that though the copy of
the report was not supplied, on the facts, as no prejudice
was proved, it was not a case warranting interference.