Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.34 seconds)
Varun Chopra An Indian vs Shyam Sunder Chopra And Sons Huf on 28 March, 2024 cites

Manugraph India Ltd vs Sigmarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. And 9 Ors on 15 June, 2016

20. The Bombay High Court in Manugraph India Ltd vs Simarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and others was dealing with the question of whether post-Sanjay Dalia supra, the right to institute a suit complaining about trade mark and copyright violation in a place where the plaintiff is residing or having a principal office is taken away. The Bombay High Court has held that the plaintiff can always file a suit complaining about trademark and copyright violation, in a Court within the local jurisdiction of which the plaintiffs' registered office or principal office is located.
Bombay High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 2 - G S Patel - Full Document

Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd vs Sanjay Dalia & Anr on 1 July, 2015

25. It is well settled position of law that a judgment cannot be read like a statute. It has to be understood in the context. If this principle is borne in mind, the law laid down in SANJAY DHALIA supra cannot be interpreted to say that to file a suit invoking Section 134 of the Act of 1999, in a place where the cause of action has arisen, the plaintiff is also required to establish that the defendant resides or carries on business in the same place where the cause of action has arisen.
Supreme Court of India Cites 57 - Cited by 157 - A Mishra - Full Document
1   2 Next