Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)Section 7 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
In the instant cases, the Commission would like to
reiterate the position of Hon'ble Supreme Court as observed in the case of
Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) & Anr. v. Aditya
Bandhopadhyay and others [(2011) 8 SCC 497] stating that:
Shail Sahni vs Sanjeev Kumar And Ors. on 5 February, 2014
Hon'ble Delhi High Court in SHAIL SAHNI vs. SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS.
[W.P.(C) 845/2014] with regard to the Misuse of the RTI Act had observed as
follows :
Mr.Ramesh Chand Jain vs Dtc, Gnct Delhi on 24 June, 2011
The Commission has time and again cautioned the RTI applicants against
misuse of the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. The Commission, in Decision No.
CIC/AD/A/2013/001326-SA dated 25.06.2014 in the matter of Ramesh Chandra
Jain v. Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), Government of National Capital
Territory of Delhi (GoNCT of Delhi); had observed as follows:
1