Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.32 seconds)
Jagdeep Singh Parmar vs Intelligence Officer, Directorate Of ... on 21 November, 2024 cites

Noor Aga vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 9 July, 2008

23. Moreover, reiteratedly in terms of the expostulations of law made in "Noor Aga V. State of Punjab and another" Criminal Appeal No.1034 of 2008, decided on 09.07.2008, there was also a further requirement that the examined stuff which was re-enclosed in the cloth parcel(s) by the Chemical Analyst and whereons become affixed the seals of the FSL concerned, thus becoming initially returned to the Malkhana concerned, and thereafter becoming produced in Court, for the same becoming then shown to the prosecution witnesses concerned, rather for therebys the charge becoming efficaciously proven. However, in the instant case there is no such evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 90 - Cited by 746 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Deepak Kumar vs State Of Punjab And Others on 27 February, 2023

19. Since this Court while answering the substantial question of law sent to the larger Bench of this Court, in case No. CRA-S-5190-SB-2015 titled as "Deepak Kumar V. State of Punjab", thus has thereins expostulated that; a) There being an imperative necessity of testings being 10 of 15 ::: Downloaded on - 23-11-2024 20:55:12 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:153816-DB CRA-D-635-DB-2013 (O&M) 11 made of the stuff inside the sample parcels. b) The inventory as becomes prepared in the presence of Magistrate concerned, in terms of Section 52A of the Act, but without testings of the stuff enclosed in the sample parcels, thus being made at the laboratory concerned, rather per se not acquiring the utmost evidentiary vigor.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 3 - G S Gill - Full Document
1   2 Next