Hari Prasad Badruka vs Tellukunta Laxmi And Ors. on 10 December, 1999
In view of the peculiar circumstances of this case, the judgment of this Court in Hari Prasad Badruka v. Tellukunta Laxmi and others , being relied upon by the learned Counsel for the respondents wherein it is held that the conduct of
the tenant who failed to file the challans of the deposit of rents into the Court immediately or within a reasonable period and having failed to issue notice to the landlord in that regard nor paid the process fee for sending such notice to the landlord by Court which is contrary to the Rule 5(4) read with Rule 16 of the Rules would amount to committing wilful default in payment of rents, has no application to the facts of the case. Therefore, the contention of the learned Counsel for the respondents that there has been non-compliance of Rule 5(4) and Rule 16 of the Rules on the side of the revision petitioner and the revision petition in that view of the matter should be dismissed merits no consideration.