cites: 70555

Kiran Singh And Others vs Chaman Paswan And Others on 14 April, 1954

13. However, Sri. Bhat, learned Counsel for the petitioners would place before me several judgments to say that the earlier order of the Land Tribunal is a nullity in the eye of law. He relies on Kiran Singh and Ors. v. Chaman Paswan and Ors. , to say that a decree passed without jurisdiction is a nullity.

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 1029 - Full Document

Mathura Prasad Bajoo Jaiswal & Ors vs Dossibai N. B. Jeejeebhoy on 26 February, 1970

Mathura Prasad Sarjoo Jaiswal and Ors. v. Dossibai N.B. Jeejeebhoy , was pressed into service for the purpose of res judicata. In the said case, the Supreme Court has ruled as follows:

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 289 - J C Shah - Full Document

Workmen Of Cochin Port Trust vs Board Of Trustees Of The Cochin Port ... on 5 May, 1978

(underling is supplied) He would also rely on The Workmen of Cochin Port Trust v. The Board of Trustees of The Cochin Port Trust and Anr., to say that Page 0614 dismissal of special leave petition need not necessarily bar entertainment of a writ petition under Articles 226 on the same grounds. The Apex Court ruled that the technical rule of res judicata, although a wholesome rule based upon public policy, cannot be stretched too far to bar the trial of identical issues in a separate proceeding.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 221 - N L Untwalia - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Srivastav vs National Insurance Company, Limited & ... on 27 April, 1998

The Supreme Court in its later judgment Ashok Kumar Srivatsav v. National Insurance Company Limited and Ors. - has ruled that a decision rendered in a writ petition operates as res judicata in subsequent judicial proceedings.

Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 64 - K T Thomas - Full Document

Jain Cloth Stores And Anr. vs Smt. Narangi Bai And Ors. on 28 January, 2004

15. This Court in Jain Cloth Stores and Ors. v. Smt. Narangi Bai and Ors. 2004 (2) KCCR 1181, has also noticed a ruling of the Supreme Court in 1995 SCR 377 reading as under:

Karnataka High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 1 - R Gururajan - Full Document

Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 5 - Cited by 1058585

Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951

Madras Presidency - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 484

Jingra Moolya vs Balakrishna on 14 March, 1995

Jingra Moolya v. Balakrishna , is a judgment of this Court, in which this Court ruled that the orders without jurisdiction is a nullity and is of no consequences in determining the rights in respect of the concerned land.

Karnataka High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Mahaveer Chambanna Kallimani And Ors. vs State Of Karnataka And Ors. on 18 April, 1996

He further relies on a decision of this Court Mahaveer Chambanna Kallimani and Ors. v. State Of Karnataka and Ors., to say that the res judicata would not apply in such cases.

Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]