Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.22 seconds)
Basanta vs Ghanshyam Since Dead Through Lrs ... on 8 December, 2025 cites

Hari Nandan Agrawal And Anr. vs S.N. Pandita And Ors. on 26 July, 1974

14. In AIR 1975 Madras 270 (FB), the Full Bench of the High Court held that Order 39 of CPC should not be considered as placing any limit on the scope of inherent power under Section 151, which are wide and not subject to any limitation. Whenever there is any violation of an order or injunction against party, or something has been done in disobedience, it will be the duty of the Court to put the clock back to set the wrong right and not allow the perpetuation of the wrong doing. The inherent power of the Court will not only be available in such cases, but it is bound to be exercised in that manner in the interest of justice. The same view was taken in Surjit Pal Vs. Prabir Kumar Sun, AIR 1986 Calcutta 220 and Hari Nandan Agrawal and another Vs. S.N. Pandita, AIR 1975 Allahabad 482.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 24 - N D Ojha - Full Document

Sujit Pal vs Prabir Kumar Sun And Ors. on 2 September, 1985

14. In AIR 1975 Madras 270 (FB), the Full Bench of the High Court held that Order 39 of CPC should not be considered as placing any limit on the scope of inherent power under Section 151, which are wide and not subject to any limitation. Whenever there is any violation of an order or injunction against party, or something has been done in disobedience, it will be the duty of the Court to put the clock back to set the wrong right and not allow the perpetuation of the wrong doing. The inherent power of the Court will not only be available in such cases, but it is bound to be exercised in that manner in the interest of justice. The same view was taken in Surjit Pal Vs. Prabir Kumar Sun, AIR 1986 Calcutta 220 and Hari Nandan Agrawal and another Vs. S.N. Pandita, AIR 1975 Allahabad 482.
Calcutta High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 71 - M M Dutt - Full Document
1   2 Next