Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)
Smt. Bivabati Paul vs Union Of India & Ors. Through on 14 July, 2014 cites

Inder Pal Yadav And Ors. Etc vs Union Of India And Ors Etc on 18 April, 1985

We may, however, observe that when a citizen aggrieved by the action of a Government Department has approached the Court and obtained a declaration of law in his favour, others, in like circumstances, should be able to rely on the sense of responsibility of the Department concerned and to expect that they will be given the benefit of this declaration without the need to take their grievances to Court. He pointed out that the aforesaid decision has been affirmed by the Apex Court in yet another case of Inder Pal Yadav vs Union of India, (1985 2 SCC 548, wherein the Apex Court has held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 749 - D A Desai - Full Document

Lt. Col. D. Ghosh (Retd.) vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 16 July, 2007

Incidentally, this principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court in this case as well as in numerous other judgments like G.C. Ghosh v. UOI, [ (1992) 19 ATC 94 (SC) ], dated 20-7-1998; K.I. Shepherd v. UOI [(JT 1987 (3) SC 600)]; Abid Hussain v. UOI [(JT 1987 (1) SC 147], etc. Accordingly, we recommend that decisions taken in one specific case either by the judiciary or the Government should be applied to all other identical cases without forcing the other employees to approach the court of law for an identical remedy or relief. We clarify that this decision will apply only in cases where a principle or common issue of general nature applicable to a group or category of Government employees is concerned and not to matters relating to a specific grievance or anomaly of an individual employee.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 108 - H Kohli - Full Document
1