Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)Section 13 in East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [Entire Act]
Devi Dayal Dixit vs Rashtriya Electric & Engineering Co. on 13 October, 1982
3. Shri Jasbir Rattan, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 has placed reliance on a judgment of Delhi High Court in the case of Shri Devi Dayal Dixit v. Rashtriya Electrical and Engineering Company2, 1983(1) R.C.R. 37 and argued that once respondent No. 2 is in possession then he would be a necessary party.
Importers And Manufacturers Ltd vs Pheroze Framroze Taraporewalaand ... on 10 December, 1952
For the afore-mentioned proposition
reference may be made to a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Importers and Manufacturers Ltd. v. Pheroze Fromroze Taraparowala3, A.I.R. 1953 S.C. 73. Moreover, the petitioner is dominus litus and if he has not impleaded the respondent No. 2 as a party he cannot be compelled to fight litigation against him. It is needless to say that any adjudication between the petitioner and Gurmukh Singh, respondent No. l would not have any affect on respondent No. 2.
1