Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 328 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Basayya Prabhayya Hallur vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 7 October, 2009
It is well settled principle of criminal jurisprudence that
the presumption of innocence of the accused is further reinforced
by his acquittal by trial court and the finding of trial court, which
had the advantage of seeing the witnesses and hearing their
evidences, can be reversed only for very substantial and
compelling reasons. [Basayya Prabhayya Hallur v. State of
Karnataka, (2009) 17 SCC 55; Ghurey Lal v. State of U.P.,
(2008) 10 SCC 450].
Section 372 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ghurey Lal vs State Of U.P on 30 July, 2008
It is well settled principle of criminal jurisprudence that
the presumption of innocence of the accused is further reinforced
by his acquittal by trial court and the finding of trial court, which
had the advantage of seeing the witnesses and hearing their
evidences, can be reversed only for very substantial and
compelling reasons. [Basayya Prabhayya Hallur v. State of
Karnataka, (2009) 17 SCC 55; Ghurey Lal v. State of U.P.,
(2008) 10 SCC 450].
Ravi Sharma vs State(Government Of N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 11 July, 2022
In a recent decision, in the case of Ravi
Sharma Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in 2022 SCC online
SC 859, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the principle laid down
in the aforesaid decision.
Shyamal Saha & Anr vs State Of West Bengal on 24 February, 2014
In Shyamal Sahu Vs. State of West
Bengal (2014) 12 SCC 321, the Supreme Court has observed that
High Court is obliged to consider whether the trial court judgment
suffers from such gross illegality so as to warrant interference. It
was held that if two reasonable conclusions are possible on the
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.753 of 2021 dt.16-09-2022
10/10
basis of evidence on record, Appellate Court should not interfere
with the acquittal recorded by the trial court.