Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.32 seconds)

Vasanti M. Shah vs All India Handloom Fabrics Marketing ... on 31 August, 1984

11 The learned counsel for Mr. Raut contended that such action should be condoned firstly because that was a part of the mass- movement and because Mr. Raut were pushed to indulge in such act by the Management. Heavy reliance is placed on the observations Borey 6/10 ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2014 22:28:15 ::: spb/ 201wp3141-99-2983-2000.sxw of the Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Vasanti (supra) by the learned counsel for Mr. Raut and also by the Labour Court. In the case of Vasanti, she was a senior sales assistant in the All India Handloom Fabrics Marketing Co-operative Society Ltd.. Allegation against her was that, she alongwith the others, protested against the transfer of some of the employees and sat outside the office and indulged into anti-canvassing activity. There was no violence. She was proceeded with and a disciplinary action was taken against her. In this connection the Division Bench observed that the mass-movement and actions taken by the striking workmen cannot be judged on the touchstone of cold logic, detached form from the atmosphere when the actions take place.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 7 - S B Majmudar - Full Document

R. Baskar, M. Baskaran, Abel Sequeira, ... vs Auto Care Centre, Madras And The ... on 15 July, 2002

In the case of Charles (supra), the learned single Judge of the Madras High Court was dealing with the case of filthy words spoken by the delinquent therein and the learned single Judge took a view that utterance of those words was a trivial Borey 8/10 ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2014 22:28:15 ::: spb/ 201wp3141-99-2983-2000.sxw matter. Surely, the action of Mr. Raut in rioting in the premises cannot be equated with using improper words.
1