Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.74 seconds)

State Of M.P. And Anr. vs Mahendra Kumar Saraf And Ors. on 4 November, 2004

Further reliance is placed by learned senior Counsel for the petitioner in Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of State of M.P. and another vs. Mahendra Kumar Saraf, [2005(3) MPLJ 578] contending inter alia that the requirement is that signing the proposal has to be verified by the Collector as the State Government is nothing but required to forward the proposal to the State Election Commission like a Postoffice after its receipt from the Collector.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 20 - R Gupta - Full Document

Siraj Ahmad Siddiqui vs Shri Prem Nath Kapoor on 13 September, 1993

41. This Court in Siraj Ahmad Siddiqui v. Prem Nath Kapoor while dealing with the provisions of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent & Eviction) Act, 1972, referring to the concept of first hearing, held as under : (SCC p.412, para 13) "13. The date of first hearing of a suit under the Code is ordinarily understood to be the date on which the court proposes to apply its mind to the contentions in the pleadings of the parties to the suit and in the documents filed by them for the purpose of framing the issues to be decided in the suit. .................We are of the view, therefore, that the date of first hearing as defined in the said Act is the date on which the court proposes to apply its mind to determine the points in controversy between the parties to the suit and to frame issues, if necessary."
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 49 - S P Bharucha - Full Document
1   2 Next