Anthonysamy vs Christoraj on 2 April, 2013
In the above case, the amendment sought for by the party concerned to
erase pleadings and evidence made by the parties. Whereas in the case on
hand, they want to correct the typographical error. In stead of 64/1, they
wrongly typed as 62/1. Therefore, the above judgment cited by the
learned counsel for the petitioner is not helpful to the case of the
petitioner.