Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.23 seconds)Section 494 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 2014
4. Subsequently, the prosecution filed a petition under Section 319
Cr.P.C. that as per the facts and circumstances of the case and material
filed by PW.1, a prima facie case was made out against the 2nd
respondent (i.e. petitioner herein), that she knowingly performed
second marriage with A1 even though she was aware of the first
marriage of A1 with PW.1 and prayed to implead the 2nd respondent as
A2 in the said case. A counter was filed by A1. The trial court on
considering the petition filed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor and the
counter filed by A1, basing on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court
in Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab and others1, allowed the
petition adding the proposed 2nd respondent as A2 in the case and
directed to issue summons to A2.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Ajay Kumar @ Bittu vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 29 January, 2021
14. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Ajay Kumar v. State of
Uttarakhand (2 supra) while considering the Constitutional Bench
judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Hardeep Singh v. State of
Punjab and others (1 supra) held that:
Shiv Prakash Mishra vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 23 July, 2019
In Shiv Prakash Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh (4 supra),
the Hon'ble Apex Court after considering the Constitutional Bench
judgment in Hardeep Singh v. State of Panjab and others (1 supra)
also stated that:
B.Subramanyam Naik 6 Others vs The State Of Ap., Rep By Pp Another on 8 February, 2022
13. This Court in Thulsya Naik & 4 others v. The State of A.P. (5
supra) observed that:
Brijendra Singh & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 April, 2017
"11. The above view was followed in Brijendra Singh v. State
of Rajasthan [(2017) 7 SCC 706] as under: