Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.58 seconds)State Of Nagaland vs Lipok Ao & Ors on 1 April, 2005
15. The decisions referred to and discussed above, to my mind, unmistakably lean in favour of condonation of the delay the petitioner has prayed for. The decisions referred to and relied upon by the respondent do not apply. However, much the opposite party-respondents try to find loopholes in the whole period of the delay, the applicant-Bank has successfully plugged them to show that the so-called lapses were in no way deliberate or intentional but only a part of the usually time-consuming and routine administrative process the movements of files in the Banking, for that matter, Government departments, entail. So, a liberal approach has to be taken in the matter of condonation of delay in terms of the guidelines of the Supreme Court in State of Nagaland v. Lipok A.O. (supra), as cited above.
Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987
11. The oft-quoted decision of the Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji (supra) might be the most important to begin with. The relevant portion of the said judgment of the Supreme Court runs as follows:
Krishnabai, Saraswathy, N. Meena, S. ... vs K.A. Krishnamurthy, Jagadambal Ammal, ... on 16 October, 2003
13. Next, in N. Bala Krishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy , it was held by the Supreme Court thus:
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Vishnu Agencies (P) Ltd. on 27 August, 1984
8. Learned Advocate for the respondent has cited two judgments, one of the Supreme Court in State of Gujarat v. Sayed Mohd. Baquir El Edross and Anr. in Union of India v. Vishnu Agencies (P.) Ltd. .
State Of Gujarat vs Sayed Mohd. Baquir El Edross on 1 September, 1981
8. Learned Advocate for the respondent has cited two judgments, one of the Supreme Court in State of Gujarat v. Sayed Mohd. Baquir El Edross and Anr. in Union of India v. Vishnu Agencies (P.) Ltd. .
G. Ramegowda, Major, Etc vs Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... on 10 March, 1988
12. Next, in G. Ramegowda v. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer , it was held that the expression "sufficient cause" must receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice and, generally, delays in preferring the appeals are required to be condoned in the interest of justice where no gross negligence or deliberate inaction or lack of bona fides is imputable to the party seeking condonation of delay.
1