Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Hanif Khan vs Gaurav Kushwah on 31 October, 2023 cites

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Shyam Kumar And Ors. on 15 July, 2005

7. So far as amount under the head of loss of leave is concerned , as per certificate Ex.P/34, on account of injuries sustained in the accident appellant was on sick leave. From Ex.P/34 and other evidence on record it is not established that on account of injuries sustained in the accident appellant was forced to take earned leave. Apparently, sick leave cannot be utilized for any other purpose whatsoever, therefore, appellant cannot be awarded any amount under the head of loss of leave. Hence, in view of above, principle laid down in Shyam Kumar (supra) does not help appellant in any way.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 15 - U C Maheshwari - Full Document

Pravat Chandra Maity vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. And Ors. on 20 September, 2006

4. Learned counsel for the appellant has also submitted that at the time of accident, appellant was serving as Sub Inspector in Police Department and it is correct that on account of injuries/permanent disability sustained in the accident, career prospects of appellant were not adversely affected and he got timely increment as well as promotion and there is no break in the service as well as loss of income on account of the injuries/permanent disability but relying on the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Pravat Chandra Maity vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. - MACD 2008 (1) (Cal.) 407, it is urged that on account of permanent disability future prospects of appellant getting any job after retirement is adversely affected, therefore, Tribunal should have awarded compensation for future loss of income from the date of retirement of the appellant. It is also urged that Tribunal has not awarded appropriate amount under the head of pain and suffering, attendant expenses, loss of amenities etc., therefore, under other conventional heads also amount be enhanced.
Calcutta High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1