Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.31 seconds)

Samiuddin @ Chotu vs The State Of Nct Delhi on 9 November, 2010

2. The Ld. Counsel for the convicts further relied upon the judgements reported in the case of Samiuddin @ Chotu Vs. State of NCT of Delhi 175 (2010) DLT 27, it was held that having regard to the fact that this Court has modified the conviction of the FIR No. 286/08; State Vs. Akash Bansal & Anr. Page 3 of 6 appellant to one u/s 392 IPC, the order on sentence is consequently modified and he is sentenced u/s 392 IPC for a period of four years.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 34 - H Kohli - Full Document

Shahid Khan @ Munna vs State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) And Ors. on 9 November, 1998

It was held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that the substantive sentence awarded to the Appellant for offence u/s 452 and 392 IPC is reduced from four years RI to three years RI. In Shahzad Khan Vs. The State (NCT of Delhi) Crl. A. no. 659/2008 decided 26­07­2011 therein Appellant was convicted for the offence punishable u/s 392 IPC as also section 25 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years, besides fine of Rs. 5,000/­ for the offence u/s 392 IPC and for the offence u/s 25 Arms Act, he was also sentenced to undergo RI for the period of one year, besides the fine of Rs. 1000/­.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 11 - N G Nandi - Full Document
1   2 Next