Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)Kishan Gopal & Anr vs Lala & Ors on 26 August, 2013
NC: 2026:KHC-D:6197
MFA No. 100716 of 2022
C/W MFA No. 102024 of 2021
MFA No. 102025 of 2021
HC-KAR AND 7 OTHERS
relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
case of Kishan Gopal and Another Vs. Lala and Others2,
awarded a compensation of ₹5,00,000/- on account of the
death of the minor. Deducting the interim compensation of
₹15,000/- paid by the NEKRTC and attributing 60%
negligence on the driver of the car, the Tribunal has awarded
₹2,91,000/-. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is
just and proper, and do not call for any interference. Hence,
the LRs of the deceased have not made out any grounds for
enhancement of compensation.
National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022
NC: 2026:KHC-D:6197
MFA No. 100716 of 2022
C/W MFA No. 102024 of 2021
MFA No. 102025 of 2021
HC-KAR AND 7 OTHERS
schedule issued by the Karnataka State Legal Services
Authority, the notional income has to be assessed at
₹11,750/-. 40% future prospects has to be added to the
income in view of the proposition of law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (supra) i.e.,
₹11,750/- + 4,700 = ₹16,450/-. The deceased was a
bachelor. Hence, 50% has to be deducted towards his
personal expenses i.e., ₹16,450/- / 2 = ₹8,225/-.
Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009
The
multiplier applicable to his age group is '18' in view of the
proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
case of Sarla Verma (supra). There is only one dependent
on the deceased. This Court re-assesses the compensation
under the following heads:
1