Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.17 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Vikram Plastics And Ors. on 27 August, 1998

This reduction in estimated expenditure consequently resulted in working of POCM at 69.32% instead of 57.40%. This resulted in the absolute figure of Rs.87.97 crores rise in the estimated income of the assessee which is not without any tangible basis and hence cannot be accepted. The AO's contention that the negligible profit declared by the assessee warrants the alteration in POCM is also cannot be accepted. We also rely on the judgment of CIT Vs Vikram Plastics 239 ITR 161 (Guj.) wherein it has been held that, where no discrepancies or defects pointed out in the books of account and further that they were regularly maintained and also on the finding that there was no material brought on record to establish that purchases or expenses were inflated or sales suppressed. The profits declared by the ITA 710/2023 & 745/2023 Page 3 of 5 This is a digitally signed order.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 42 - A R Dave - Full Document
1