Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.72 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Chameli Singh And Others Etc. vs State Of U.P. And Another on 15 December, 1995
17. The Apex Court in Chameli Singh v. State of U.P.,(1996(2) SCC 549) considered the extended meaning given to the term right of life and observed thus:-
Section 31 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, ... vs Ratan Prakash Mangal & Ors., Etc on 6 May, 1988
15. The Apex Court in KRISH UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI v. RATAN PRAKASH MANGAL (1988(3) SCC 225), held that the State Government was not bound to agree with the report of the Land Acquisition Officer and proceedings could be initiated by the Government disregarding the recommendation made by the District Collector.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd vs Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors on 20 September, 2005
It is true that the Apex Court in Hindustan Petroleum case cited supra observed that the right to take part in the enquiry under Section 5A is akin to that of a fundamental right. The award file should show the satisfaction arrived at by the Government for the purpose of acquisition. The award file produced by the respondents clearly shows that the report submitted by the Collector was considered by the Government independently and opinion was formed to proceed with the acquisition by overruling the recommendation made for exclusion of the property of the petitioners and others by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. Therefore there was no violation of the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act in acquiring the property of the petitioners.