Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.31 seconds)
Rudrapratapsinh Hemantkumar Patel ... vs State Of Gujarat on 16 January, 2024 cites

Daler Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 October, 2015

[7.2] Considering the peculiar facts of the present case, the authorities relied on by the learned advocate for the petitioner on the (i) oral dated 09.09.2022 passed by the Punjab & Haryana Page 5 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Jan 18 20:41:07 IST 2024 NEUTRAL CITATION R/SCR.A/10357/2023 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2024 undefined High Court in the case of Kuldeep Singh vs. Union of India and Others rendered in CWP No.19331 of 2022; (ii) decision dated 29.10.2021 of the coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Patel Ankurbhai Shapurji vs. State of Gujarat & 2 Others rendered in Special Criminal Application No.9799/2021; (iii) order dated 01.10.2015 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Daler Singh vs. Union of India and Others rendered in CWP No.12143 of 2015 and (iv) order dated 03.02.2023 passed by Kerala High Court in the case of Akshay Kiran @ Arjun vs. State of Kerala rendered in Crl. M. C. No.662 of 2023 would not be of any assistance to the petitioner as the facts in the said cases were different from the facts of the case on hand as in the present case, the petitioner is already in Canada and in the present case, presence of petitioner - accused is required to be secured by the Investigating Officer and hence, arguments canvassed by the learned APP deserves consideration. The respondent shall have liberty to take appropriate steps to secure the presence of accused as the accused remained absconding.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 42 - H S Sidhu - Full Document

Thakur Kuldeep Singh(D) Thr. Lr. & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 8 March, 2010

[7.2] Considering the peculiar facts of the present case, the authorities relied on by the learned advocate for the petitioner on the (i) oral dated 09.09.2022 passed by the Punjab & Haryana Page 5 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Jan 18 20:41:07 IST 2024 NEUTRAL CITATION R/SCR.A/10357/2023 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2024 undefined High Court in the case of Kuldeep Singh vs. Union of India and Others rendered in CWP No.19331 of 2022; (ii) decision dated 29.10.2021 of the coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Patel Ankurbhai Shapurji vs. State of Gujarat & 2 Others rendered in Special Criminal Application No.9799/2021; (iii) order dated 01.10.2015 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Daler Singh vs. Union of India and Others rendered in CWP No.12143 of 2015 and (iv) order dated 03.02.2023 passed by Kerala High Court in the case of Akshay Kiran @ Arjun vs. State of Kerala rendered in Crl. M. C. No.662 of 2023 would not be of any assistance to the petitioner as the facts in the said cases were different from the facts of the case on hand as in the present case, the petitioner is already in Canada and in the present case, presence of petitioner - accused is required to be secured by the Investigating Officer and hence, arguments canvassed by the learned APP deserves consideration. The respondent shall have liberty to take appropriate steps to secure the presence of accused as the accused remained absconding.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 159 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Akshay Kiran @ Arjun vs State Of Kerala on 3 February, 2023

[7.2] Considering the peculiar facts of the present case, the authorities relied on by the learned advocate for the petitioner on the (i) oral dated 09.09.2022 passed by the Punjab & Haryana Page 5 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Jan 18 20:41:07 IST 2024 NEUTRAL CITATION R/SCR.A/10357/2023 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2024 undefined High Court in the case of Kuldeep Singh vs. Union of India and Others rendered in CWP No.19331 of 2022; (ii) decision dated 29.10.2021 of the coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Patel Ankurbhai Shapurji vs. State of Gujarat & 2 Others rendered in Special Criminal Application No.9799/2021; (iii) order dated 01.10.2015 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Daler Singh vs. Union of India and Others rendered in CWP No.12143 of 2015 and (iv) order dated 03.02.2023 passed by Kerala High Court in the case of Akshay Kiran @ Arjun vs. State of Kerala rendered in Crl. M. C. No.662 of 2023 would not be of any assistance to the petitioner as the facts in the said cases were different from the facts of the case on hand as in the present case, the petitioner is already in Canada and in the present case, presence of petitioner - accused is required to be secured by the Investigating Officer and hence, arguments canvassed by the learned APP deserves consideration. The respondent shall have liberty to take appropriate steps to secure the presence of accused as the accused remained absconding.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - K Babu - Full Document

Patel Ankurbhai Shapurji vs State Of Gujarat on 29 October, 2021

[7.2] Considering the peculiar facts of the present case, the authorities relied on by the learned advocate for the petitioner on the (i) oral dated 09.09.2022 passed by the Punjab & Haryana Page 5 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Jan 18 20:41:07 IST 2024 NEUTRAL CITATION R/SCR.A/10357/2023 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2024 undefined High Court in the case of Kuldeep Singh vs. Union of India and Others rendered in CWP No.19331 of 2022; (ii) decision dated 29.10.2021 of the coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Patel Ankurbhai Shapurji vs. State of Gujarat & 2 Others rendered in Special Criminal Application No.9799/2021; (iii) order dated 01.10.2015 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Daler Singh vs. Union of India and Others rendered in CWP No.12143 of 2015 and (iv) order dated 03.02.2023 passed by Kerala High Court in the case of Akshay Kiran @ Arjun vs. State of Kerala rendered in Crl. M. C. No.662 of 2023 would not be of any assistance to the petitioner as the facts in the said cases were different from the facts of the case on hand as in the present case, the petitioner is already in Canada and in the present case, presence of petitioner - accused is required to be secured by the Investigating Officer and hence, arguments canvassed by the learned APP deserves consideration. The respondent shall have liberty to take appropriate steps to secure the presence of accused as the accused remained absconding.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - I J Vora - Full Document
1   2 Next