Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)Alka Bose vs Parmatma Devi & Ors on 17 December, 2008
It is necessary to refer the
following passage in Alka Rose's case ;
Article 54 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 54 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Section 68 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
R.Chinnadurai vs S.Rajalakshmi on 18 December, 2003
7. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the plaintiff, the
above decision referred by the learned Subordinate Judge is not applicable
5/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
CRP(MD).No.1111 of 2021
to the case on hand. As already pointed out, both the parties have entered
into an agreement for the sale of suit properties to the plaintiff by the
defendant for the price fixed at Rs.3,00,000/- and after the payment of
advance amount of Rs.50,000/- on 15.12.2016, they have entered into a
document named as sale receipt and whereunder, they have referred the
earlier transaction held on 15.10.2016 and also the payment of further
advance of Rs.1,00,000/- made on that day. As rightly pointed out by the
learned counsel for the plaintiff, in the said sale receipt, both the plaintiff
and the defendant have subscribed their signatures along with witnesses.
The Limitation Act, 1963
1