Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.42 seconds)Section 6 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Article 64 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 65 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By Lrs & Ors on 25 March, 2008
29. Learned counsel for the respondent has placed
reliance on a decision reported in 2008 SAR (Civil) 878
[Anathula Sudhakar Vs. P. Buchi Reddy]. The principles
enunciated in this decision are directly applicable to the case in
hand as, in the instant case the records clearly establish that,
the defendants are in possession of the suit schedule property
35
and since they are in a settled possession under lease
agreement, the trial Court has rightly granted injunction.
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
T. Anjanappa And Ors vs Somalingappa And Anr on 22 August, 2006
The same principle is again reiterated in the
decision reported in 2006 (6) AIR KAR R 13
[T.Anjanappa and Others Vs. Somalingappa and
Another]. Hence, the trial Court has rightly rejected the
claim of defendants regarding adverse possession.
Section 90 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Maria Margadia Sequeria Fernandes & Ors vs Erasmo Jack De Sequeria (D) Tr.Lrs.& Ors on 21 March, 2012
24. The learned counsel has further placed reliance
on a decision reported in AIR 2012 SC (Civil) 1201 [Maria
Margarida Sequeria Fernandes and Others Vs. Erasmo
Jack de Sequeria (Dead) through LRs.], which is in
respect of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act and wherein
the suit by a person other than title holder and the nature of
the pleadings are enumerated in detail. In the instant case,
the plaintiff is seeking possession on the basis of title and
31
hence Section 6 of the Specific Relief is not applicable to the
case of the plaintiff and hence, the principles enunciated in
the above cited decision will not render any assistance to the
plaintiff.